Jump to content

Ost-030: A Case In Point


Recommended Posts

What did you use to create the port moulds? Something like silicone RTV? Tricky to pull out?

casting-beginning_zps8a8f6c3a.jpg

 

castingremoval-corkscrewpartway_zpsd0fdfef5.jpg

 

 

Fair enough. I pin the extractors to the head so they go on exactly each time, and I glue the gasket onto the head in a couple of spots to hold it in place.

 

Many of my clients don't fully understand the effects... in many cases the detail I show in the headwork goes a long way to educate them. Remember MANY 4AG powered cars are in the hands of low budget, or first time owners....

 

 

 

Without checking it..

 

stroke volume is 3.14x41x41x77=369.5

piston sticks up 3.14x41.41.0.3=1.6

gasket is 3.14x41x41x1.3=6.86

 

Let X be the head volume.

 

So the BDC volume is

369.5+6.86+X-1.6-3.2 which is 371.56 + X

 

The TDC volume is

X +6.86 -1.6-3.2 which is X + 2.06

 

For an 11.3 to one CR

BDC volume = 11.3(TDC volume)

371.56 + X = 11.3(X + 2.06)

371.56 + X = 11.3X + 23.28

371.56-23.28 = 11.3X - X

348.28 = 10.3X

so X = 34.83

 

 

..and can I have 25minutes of my life back please!

 

 

 

 

oh' date=' and account for the gasket too. so chamber volume will need to be

 

so swept volume is 406638.3mm^3

 

so your desired theoretical chamber volume will be 35985.7mm^3, just add or subtract the various volumes from this, no? is the "dome" of the piston convex or concave?[/quote']

 

 

 

As to the chamber volume I'll need... I find to save time, and poor calculating skills on my part - I use one of the online compression calculators..... https://www.rbracing...staticcalc.html or http://www.csgnetwor...m/compcalc.html

 

 

in both cases we come up with about 37cc (37.3 in the RB racing calculator)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Members dont see this ad

So with OST-031 now @ the machine shop getting its valve job and surfacing we delve back into OST-030

 

 

I've gotten the head back from the machine shop, they have provided a minimum resurfacing .003", to add to the previous clients report of a .008" resurfacing, the current surface is not quite @ .011, closer to .0102". This head is now 115.74mm thick, having had a total of .26mm removed.

 

Typically with a 10 thou cut you can expect chamber volumes to drop to about 35cc, the deshouding adds about .4cc, to gain volume I had the valve seats machined an extra .003" to gain 1cc in chamber volume, this lowers the valve on the seat allowing for a bit more volume in the chamber. The valve tips were cat an equal amount so use of more common shims sizes is retained.

 

back_from_machine_shop_w_3_angle.jpg

 

So right now the chambers sit @ 36.4cc (1/10cc tolerance)

 

measuring_chamber_volume_-_smaller.jpg

 

All the cam journals look pretty much the same as this...

journal_scratching.jpg

 

Since MR2tailbreaker noticed a "small" problem in his cam and journal clearances using the Poncams' date=' I'll be checking these journals for similar issues.....

 

 

[/quote']

 

The FSM(BGB) states the cam to journal clearance to be .035mm to .072mm, with nothing greater then .1mm

 

checking_cam_journals_with_Plastigage.jpg

 

 

Using the Plastigage PL-X - The PL-X range is a bit on the tight side for measuring the whole range of the cam to journal - a bit too small for perfect accuracy, but in this case it works adequately.

 

checking_cam_journals_with_Plastigage2.jpg

 

This is one of the measurements, you can see it is quite a bit narrower then .045mm which is middle tight of the span in the FSM.

 

By carefully surfacing the cam cap "feet" we can get this dimesion closer to the center of the specification

 

checking_cam_journals_with_Plastigage3.jpg

 

 

 

Here is a 2nd journal going from a bit loose....

 

checking_cam_journals_with_Plastigage4.jpg

 

 

to middle of the spec

 

checking_cam_journals_with_Plastigage5.jpg

 

 

Of course the worst one I didn't get a photo of, that was #5 on the intake side... farthest from the oil supply, it was so loose that most of the Plastigage thread was intact when checked, and it too was brought into spec.

 

 

Now that the cam journals are all within tolerance, assembly can begin.....

 

 

 

More to come..... :D

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:y: I'm loving how technical/well documented this thread is.

 

;) thanks...

 

Showing off her angles....

 

showing_3_angle.jpg

 

 

 

Now that the cam journals are all within tolerance' date=' assembly can begin.....

 

 

 

[/quote']

 

 

The head and hardware are all laid out, #1 cylinder already has the valves in....

 

head_prior_to_assembly.jpg

 

 

Now half assembled...

 

head_half_assembled.jpg

 

 

 

sometimes during assembly you see something that you just don't like.... tossed the retainer on the left for the one on the right. There was no other damage, I just didn't like that kind of a flaw.

 

swapped_retainer.jpg

 

 

 

Fully assembled... now whats left is setting the valve clearances, and getting it back to my client.

 

assembled_head_cam_side.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

More to come..... :D

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Valves @ full lift...

 

Exhaust....

 

exhaust_valves_at_full_lift.jpg

 

 

Intake...

 

intake_valves_at_full_lift.jpg

 

Fully assembled... now whats left is setting the valve clearances' date=' and getting it back to my client.

 

[/quote']

What_ten_thousandths_looks_like.jpg

 

 

 

Its packaged back in its case.... with the latch zip tied down...

 

latch_with_OST_logo_in_ziptie.jpg

I heated the end of my punch a bit so I could get it to impress into the ziptie.

 

All that is left on this is shipping back to my client....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As_arrived____.jpg

 

 

All that is left on this is shipping back to my client....

 

 

Why I insist on insuring the finished product for its shipment back to it's owner......

 

case_damaged_on_shipment.jpg

 

 

 

I've been told the head itself did not sustain any damage... but this shows significant intrusion.... so when I say the insurance adds $20' date=' or $30 to the return shipping cost...

 

its just to [u']COVER YOUR ASSets.[/u]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...